16
Jun

No Support, No Possession?

   Posted by: Margo Fox   in Divorce

This is a question that is raised frequently:  “Do I have to allow him to have possession of the kids if he is not paying his support?”  Some have said that the law should be changed to allow the Obligee parent (the one with the right to receive support) to deny access/possession of the children by the Obligor parent (the one obligated to pay support).  This blog is directed at stating the current law and the ramifications if the law is changed to allow the denial of access based on nonpayment of support.

Currently, the law under Section 153.001 (b) states that “[a] court may not render an order that conditions the right of a conservator to possession of or access to a child on the payment of child support.”

An Obligee currently has a remedy:  file an enforcement action if the Obligor is delinquent for any period of time or contact the Attorney General (“AG”) to begin its proceedings.  Certainly, this process could be made easier than it already is which could alleviate the delay in going through the Attorney General’s (“AG”) office or the expense of hiring a lawyer.  There are probably several things that could be improved here that would help Obligee to receive funds sooner and alleviate the burden on the State.  Perhaps an improvement would be that there is a blanket no cost of court to the Obligee to file in the civil courts (in order to obtain a faster remedy than the AG’s office) or attorney’s fees are automatic at the time of Temporary Orders if there is a showing of nonpayment that is purposeful, etc.

Certainly, an Obligee could deny access (because of arrearages) and the remedy for the Obligor is file a motion for enforcement.  Now, we all know that courts frown on the denial of access as well as an Obligor’s refusal/failure to pay child support.  We strongly caution clients against denying access due to lack of support and instead encourage them to file an enforcement action or go through the AG’s office.

Preventing access because the Obligor is not paying support is (in my opinion) very problematic for the many what ifs and scenarios that could be imagined:

  1. WHAT IF—the Obligor is laid off (in this economy this is not too hard to imagine) and although receives unemployment, it runs out and he/she is unable to find work (sounds hard to imagine but again, it’s a possibility).  Should in this case, the children not see their parent?
  2. WHAT IF—the Obligor becomes disabled and although he/she attempts to collect social security, the attempt takes a year or more and therefore cannot provide support in the interim b/c he/she can barely provide for him/herself?  Should in this case, the children not see their parent?
  3. WHAT IF—the Obligor is terminally ill, lost his job, doesn’t have time to file for unemployment, etc.  Should in this case, the children not see their parent?
  4. WHAT IF—the Obligor has mental/emotional issues that do not rise to the level of affecting the children but prevent the Obligor from obtaining/sustaining employment?  Should in this case, the children not see their parent?
  5. And there are probably a hundred more scenarios . . .

Just a consideration here, but if an Obligor does not pay BUT still takes the children pursuant to at least a standard possession schedule, doesn’t that help the Obligee out monetarily?  The Obligee doesn’t have to provide food, care, shelter, etc. for the time that the children are with the other parent.

Another consideration is, if there is an automatic suspension of possession, what happens if the Obligor IS so destitute that he or she cannot afford to hire a lawyer to reinstate his/her possession?  Should the children not see their parent with whom they’ve had a relationship because the Obligor cannot afford legal assistance?

I would fear the impact on children if they could not see their parent, not because of a true danger to the children, but because of money.  The impact on children could be severe—you could only imagine how awful it could be for little ones who have had a continuing relationship with their parent to suddenly not see him/her.  This truly, although I’ve written it last, is the most important, most severe, most dangerous impact if the law is changed to permit a denial of access based on nonpayment of support.

Of course, both parents should help to support their children.  And, of course, we need to hold Obligors accountable.  If/when we improve the system (as there are always improvements that can be made in any system), we need to make changes that benefit the little ones that are ones suffering the most through the conflict.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 at 7:54 pm and is filed under Divorce. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

33 comments so far

April
 1 

Pretty cool post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say
that I have really liked browsing your blog posts. In any case
I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you post again soon!

June 23rd, 2009 at 8:01 pm
 2 

Hi,
Ugh, I liked! So clear and positively.
AlexAxe

August 29th, 2009 at 2:39 pm
 3 

Hello,
foxlawtexas.com – da best. Keep it going!
Have a nice day
SonyaSunny

September 5th, 2009 at 11:03 am
 4 

Great site…keep up the good work.

September 6th, 2009 at 1:22 am
 5 

Hey good stuff…keep up the good work! :)

September 8th, 2009 at 1:23 am
 6 

This site rocks!

September 11th, 2009 at 7:34 am
 7 

Thanks much for that awesome piece of text.

September 13th, 2009 at 9:43 pm
 8 

This blog rocks! I gotta say, that I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks,

A definite great read…

-Bill-Bartmann

September 14th, 2009 at 12:53 am
 9 

Great site…keep up the good work. I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks,

A definite great read…:)

-Bill-Bartmann

September 16th, 2009 at 9:00 pm
 10 

Cool site, love the info. I do a lot of research online on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks,

A definite great read…:)

-Bill-Bartmann

September 18th, 2009 at 7:00 am
 11 

Hi, Not sure that this is true:), but thanks for a post.
Thanks
Hobosic

September 18th, 2009 at 1:32 pm
 12 

Hey good stuff…keep up the good work! I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks,)

A definite great read.. :)

-Bill-Bartmann

September 18th, 2009 at 5:15 pm
 13 

Nice content indeed! i will visit as often as i can.

cheers

September 18th, 2009 at 9:15 pm
 14 

Hi, Interesting, I`ll quote it on my site later.

September 20th, 2009 at 10:37 pm
 15 

I’m going home to …’s place,
—————————————
signature: buy ditropan

September 21st, 2009 at 12:17 am
 16 

I am ever so sorry!
—————————————
signature: order liponexol

September 21st, 2009 at 3:13 am
 17 

I need your help.
—————————————
signature: leukeran online

September 21st, 2009 at 6:45 am
 18 

I don’t know If I said it already but …Great site…keep up the good work. :) I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks, :)

A definite great read..

-Bill-Bartmann

September 22nd, 2009 at 12:56 am
 19 

Nice site!

September 23rd, 2009 at 10:26 pm
 20 

I don’t usually reply to posts but I will in this case, great info…I will add a backlink and bookmark your site. Keep up the good work!

September 24th, 2009 at 4:47 am
 21 

Can i get a one small photo from your site?
Thanks

September 24th, 2009 at 10:38 am
 22 

Hello,
foxlawtexas.com to GoogleReader!
Thanks
Bodyc

September 27th, 2009 at 12:46 am
 23 

Hey very nice blog!!….I’m an instant fan, I have bookmarked you and I’ll be checking back on a regular….See ya

September 29th, 2009 at 7:47 pm
 24 

There’s good info here. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your blog. Keep up the good work mate!

September 29th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
 25 

Hey, I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say GREAT blog!…..I”ll be checking in on a regularly now….Keep up the good work! :)

September 30th, 2009 at 4:51 am
kidaRoata
 26 

It can hardly be so.
—————————————
signature: buy bactrim

October 2nd, 2009 at 9:35 am
kempozone
 27 

I’m sure many of you are like me and one of the first things you do in the morning is head here and check out the new post. Along with seeing the new posts, I’m also always checking out the blog roll rss feed and watching them grow, or shrink sometimes. In one of my past …but all in all excellent site. Keep it up!

October 11th, 2009 at 2:14 pm
HenleyL
 28 

Hey, I really enjoy your blog. I have a blog too in a totally unrelated field (Online Stock Trading) but I like to check in here on a regular basis, just to see what’s going on and it’s always interesting to say the least. It’s always entertaining what people have to say.

October 12th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
Lilian
 29 

I enjoyed reading your blog.

October 19th, 2009 at 5:04 am
Kaia
 30 

Great job! Can’t wait to start my own blog.

October 21st, 2009 at 6:09 am
 31 

I will be sure to bookmark your site and check later.

October 22nd, 2009 at 4:51 am
 32 

I wrote a similar article regarding this subject but your is better. :)

December 10th, 2009 at 10:14 pm
 33 

Waow enjoyed reading this post. I submitted your rss to my blogreader!!

December 13th, 2009 at 5:18 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment